soc.culture.usa
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa
soc.culture.usa@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Time For Blacks To Declare A Culture War? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/573fb76db7781873
* Black Scholar Fearz Future of Young Black Men - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/2e5f10360af7e066
* Your home in Shanghai China - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/24729ecc1f7b0efe
* US considers use of nuclear weapons against Iran - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/d7d436c7da18b227
* Iran Plans On Ivading And Occupying The USA And Will Enslave Us All! We Must
Attack Them Before They Invade US!! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/6113f636165294a4
* AID TO ISRAEL MAY BE CANCELLED! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/9126bc5d0bc244ca
* HOMELAND SECURITY AGENT ARRESTED FOR SEDUCING 14-YR-OLD GIRL - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/009334c1cbc0f97e
* JEWISH TERRORISTS.... - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/edc3b0051a6c40fc
* Where are all the great ruins of the Negro nations? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/5cfe37852f40f77c
* Thank you, India admirer ! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/e5d8f7ba709dcb5b
* NO LINK TO AL QAEDA, JUST LIKE IN 911 - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/69c428c609c64c3a
* Indians Become Christian - Chinese Become Muslim - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/94a7c72770b10f0c
* The sociology of sexual misconducts between teachers and students in America.
- 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/d1d8cb27ee7adc77
* is president Bush preparing to use Nuclear bombs to destroy Iran ? - 2
messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/4394913e837521f4
* WORLD WAR III NEWS, Monday, April 10th, 2006 AD......Iran attack would be '
nuts' - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/5f8a6fe8a4a0fc80
* GENIE HAS THE ANSWER - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/c53109850ba806e2
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Time For Blacks To Declare A Culture War?
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/573fb76db7781873
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 5:50 pm
From: Von Bailey
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:32:05 -0400, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:54:17 -0500, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/404374p-342477c.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Specifically, we need aggressive, concerted action by members and
>>>>>>>>>institutions of the respectable black middle class to do open combat
>>>>>>>>>against the rise of an ancient enemy: a bold, seductive street
>>>>>>>>>culture that exalts lawlessness, addiction and anti-family behavior
>>>>>>>>>like pimping, sexual promiscuity, ignorance and personal selfishness."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now before anyone screams "racism" or "bigot", click on the link below
>>>>>>>>>and note that the author is as much as an African-American (born in
>>>>>>>>>Harlem, now lives in Brooklyn) as any other black man.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You say that as if a black person can't work towards the goal of those
>>>>>>>>who work against black people. That's why your stupid rationales
>>>>>>>>never make sense, they are based on ridiculous assumptions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, the ridiculous assumption here is yours, namely that blacks like
>>>>>>>Mr Louis are working "against", not for, black people. So, in the
>>>>>>>case of someone like him, who was born in Harlem and lives among his
>>>>>>>fellow blacks in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn (a mostly black
>>>>>>>section of Brooklyn, which itself is mostly black), why on earth would
>>>>>>>he not want to advance the cause of black people, since he is one of
>>>>>>>them and lives among them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>To make money.
>>>>>
>>>>>You really ARE simple-minded..
>>>>
>>>>The assumption that money isn't a powerful motivator is simple-minded.
>>>
>>>Please explain what that has to with a black columnist who obviously
>>>works and lives among his fellow blacks, wanting to lift up those
>>>around him. How is condemning "pimping, sexual promiscuity, ignorance
>>>and personal selfishness" in the `hood working "against" black people?
>>>
>>>
>>No, he's condemning a certain kind of music as if it's a source of a
>>problem instead of one of the symptoms. Pimping, sexual prmiscuity
>>and ignorance was around long before rap and by more than just black
>>people. It isn't a 'black problem' it is a subject and POV that will
>>get him published in newspapers and magazines. Whether or not he
>>honestly shares the feelings he rants is irrelevant as they are
>>superficial attacks that will result in nothing except his getting
>>into print, noticed and paid.
>
>IOW, yer head is stuck deep in the sand, and you like it just fine
>right there. As for the rest of your copouts, "pimping, sexual
>prmiscuity and ignorance" are NOT big problems today in most
>communities, outside of the `hood. You're simply too out of touch.
>
So are you claiming only people "in the hood" (where ever that may be)
are pimping women, act sexually promiscuous or ignorant or are you
saying that it's only a problem with people "in the hood" and when
other people act in the same way it's not a problem?
von
---
There is no conversation that I can have that threatens my reality and I
don't see how anyone can live with such a precarious state of mind.
---
God isn't the problem, religion is. Something that doesn't exist
can't really be a problem. Worshiping something that doesn't exist
is an entirely different subect.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Black Scholar Fearz Future of Young Black Men
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/2e5f10360af7e066
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 5:57 pm
From: Von Bailey
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:05:52 -0400, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>gOn Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:44:57 -0700, Von Bailey
><ovbailey@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 11:20:38 -0400, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>>>
>>>http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060326/FEATURES/603260683
>>>
>>>Scholar fears future of young black men
>>>
>>>"Every time I see these young black men walking up and down the
>>>streets with these funny clothes on, I could just scream. I feel so
>>>bad. So bad," said Franklin in a telephone interview from his office
>>>in North Carolina.
>>>
>>>Imagine his reaction if he saw the lyrcis to a typical cRap song.
>>
>>Typical of you to take the man's words out of context for your pitiful
>>war on Rap. He says what he blames for the condition that he
>>observes.
>>
>>"...he faults millionaire sports and entertainment figures for not
>>giving a hand to those struggling to make it -- and the white majority
>>as well. The economy plays a huge role -- a minimum wage that supports
>>no one -- as does a political system that continues to ignore the
>>realities of black social and economic status. And the United States
>>has a long history of exploiting not only its natural resources but
>>its human resources as well."
>>_________________________________
>
>Actually, it is YOU who is quoting him out of context (your typical MO
>here). He does NOT suggest anywhere that young black men are wearing
>"funny clothes" due to economics or millionaires or white folks at
>all. He knows, what everyone except you seems to know, is they dress
>themselves in the morning, no one else is responsible. He makes it
>quite clear that the mere sight of that sickens him.
>
Your pitiful diatribe assumes that his issue was that they were
wearing funny clothes instead of having no viable prospects in this
country.
>So it's a good question to wonder if the 91-year old Franklin has had
>the opportunity (or dared) to check out the world of cRap. Here is a
>black man who predates the Civil Rights movement, so one can only
>wonder what his reaction would be to some of those lyrics.
>
And given that he is STILL ALIVE and has been as affected by them at
least as much as you have and didn't deem it necessary to bring it up
we have to assume you've pulled this whole sermon of yours out of your
ass yet again.
>And it's not "my" war on cRap, there are many prominent blacks who are
>just as down on it as I am, and that list is growing all the time.
>
...in your little world. Most people know that music is a reflection
of society conditions it does not create social conditions. Only the
weak minded believe otherwise because their weak foundations on
relaity are threatened by so little. That explains you.
von
---
There is no conversation that I can have that threatens my reality and I
don't see how anyone can live with such a precarious state of mind.
---
God isn't the problem, religion is. Something that doesn't exist
can't really be a problem. Worshiping something that doesn't exist
is an entirely different subect.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Your home in Shanghai China
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/24729ecc1f7b0efe
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:04 pm
From: "joyce"
Your home in Shanghai China
Location: In the CBD of Shanghai ,the French concession
Apartment 1br for $600-800
2br for $1200-1500
3br for $1800-2500
4br for $2500-3000
with club(Gym; Indoor Swimming Pool; Sauna; Tennis court; 24 hous
Security)
Old Villa (whole building) $2000-5000 with private garden view
No commission
Fully furnished with home appliance for your needs
Full service (housekeeping /translation / gym /golf club)
>From Joyce
(86)3416 0078
(86)136 1191 2549
joycewangli@gmail.com
joyce090205@hotmail.com
jinkui_sun@5i5j.com
5i5j real estate service Ltd., (Shanghai)
==============================================================================
TOPIC: US considers use of nuclear weapons against Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/d7d436c7da18b227
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:18 pm
From: "Joseph Welch"
"Dr. James Slaughter" <jslaughter@criswell.edu> wrote in message
news:Xns97A0A365BF336praisethelord@207.217.125.201...
> Better a mushroom cloud over Teheran than Telaviv
Why?
--
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 1:38 am
From: acoustic@panix.com (lo yeeOn)
In article <Xns97A0A365BF336praisethelord@207.217.125.201>,
Dr. James Slaughter <jslaughter@criswell.edu> wrote:
>Better a mushroom cloud over Teheran than Telaviv
>
>
>--
>Professor James Slaughter
>Criswell College, Dallas, Texas USA
>www.criswell.edu
Really?
We should listen to Seymour Hersh, even if we aren't scientifically
literate enough to understand that the diffusion process of the
radioactive matter goes in all directions and ends up hurting Israel
as well if a mushroom cloud were to go up over Tehran.
A retired four-star general told me that, despite the eight thousand
British troops in the region, ``the Iranians could take Basra with ten
mullahs and one sound truck.''
``If you attack,'' the high-ranking diplomat told me in Vienna,
``Ahmadinejad will be the new Saddam Hussein of the Arab world, but
with more credibility and more power. You must bite the bullet and sit
down with the Iranians.''
The diplomat went on, ``There are people in Washington who would be
unhappy if we found a solution. They are still banking on isolation
and regime change. This is wishful thinking.'' He added, ``The window
of opportunity is now.''
Hersh also said on CNN,
Hersh told CNN however, that the White House has spurned Tehran's
overtures for dialogue.
"This president is not talking to the Iranians. They are trying very
hard to make contact, I can assure you of that, in many different
forms," he said.
"He's not talking. And there's no public pressure on the White House
to start bilateral talks. And that's what amazes everybody," he said.
My question is:
WHERE IS CONGRESS?
(We'll return to the responsibility of Congress momentarily.)
Now, concerning the need for negotiation, our chief diplomat, in
speaking to Congress recently, declared:
"On this one I don't think speaking softly about the democracy problem
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
in Iran is really the appropriate course. I think we do have to be very
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
public about it," Rice said.
In [a previous] interview with Reuters, Rice showed little patience
with Iran's belated interest in a Russian compromise proposal that
would keep the case out of the Security Council.
By talking loudly about Iran with all threats but no direct talks, the
remaining option is clearly to strike. That is really what Rice wants
to happen despite her repeated claims in public that she wants to let
diplomacy work.
Now, both the German Foreign Minister and the Iranian Foreign Minister
have suggested direct talks between the US and Iran. So, why shouldn't
we talk for the sake of mutual survival, instead of mutually assured
destruction?
Madam Secretary, you said the US remained committed to diplomacy in
search of a solution to the Iranian situation. Now is the time for
you and Mr. Mottaki of Iran, your counterpart, to sit down and talk
face to face.
You also said recently that Iran was the single most dangerous country
the US had to face today. And you, calling yourself a Soviet expert,
must know very well that less than twenty years ago, Russia under the
Soviet leadership was definitively considered by our leaders in the US
as the single most dangerous country we had to face. What did we do?
We didn't say we wouldn't talk to you, wouldn't allow you to develop
your nuclear program, and wouldn't remove the military option from the
table. We didn't do those things because we knew those stiff
conditions would lead to failure. (So, why impose this kind of
dead-end conditions now with respect to Iran and push ourselves into a
corner to launch another attack of a country just to show how we can't
be defied? And let's be clear most experts do not believe that we
could then silence Iran, not to mention causing an internal rebellion
which would overthrow the current government. No sane mind would
believe that the people of a country would overthrow a government they
democratically elected just because they were bombed by foreigners.
To the contrary, they will close ranks and the whole world would be
angry with the aggressors, just as they already have shown in the case
of Iraq.)
We took the only positive avenue available to us and negotiated with
the Russians. And no war and no loss of lives to either sides, as a
result of that positive attitude.
So, why don't you, Madam Secretary, sit down with your counterpart of
the country you consider as the most dangerous country today just as
your forebears did with their counterparts of the Soviet Union?
Empty threats escalate tension and lead to disaster.
So far, Madam Secretary, you have failed in everything you have done
where you have taken an aggressive posture, whether it was towards
N. Korea, Venezuela, or Iraq.
I think you should show that success means more to you than kissing
the boots of the neocons and their puppets Bush and Cheney.
Lastly (about Congress), we heard that the generals are objecting to
the nuclear option in any military attack against Iran. But we also
heard that some in Congress would not endorse any military attack
against Iran, without a nuclear option. What do these congressional
representatives have in mind when they choose the path of destruction
over peace? Why do we still have a Congress which conspires with the
Bush White House to have another war, after the mess in Iraq?
If these blood-thirsty representatives in Congress bomb Iran with
nukes they will have neither a quick war and maybe not even a pyrrhic
victory. They are suffering from delusion.
The American people should not however let our delusional power elite
plunge the world into further destruction. We should definitely hold
Congress responsible for any further aggression our president may
launch.
lo yeeOn
========
By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer 46 minutes ago
TEHRAN, Iran -
Iran said Tuesday it is willing to negotiate with world powers on
large-scale enrichment of uranium but will never give way on their key
demand -- to cease all enrichment, a process that can produce fuel for
nuclear reactors or material for bombs.
The U.N. Security Council has demanded that Iran suspend all uranium
enrichment activities and asked the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency to
report back by April 28 on whether Iran had complied.
Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki reiterated that Iran would not
comply with the Security Council demand, saying the small-scale
enrichment it resumed in February was strictly for research and was
within its rights.
The United States and France have accused Iran of pursuing a secret
program to build atomic weapons, but Tehran claims its nuclear program
is peaceful and aimed only at generating electricity. Enrichment makes
uranium suitable for reactor use but, taken to a high degree, it
becomes suitable for a nuclear bomb.
"The enrichment of uranium ... is Iran's right as defined as a
signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty," Mottaki said. "One
thing we can't give up and that is the right of the Iranian nation ...
We can't hold a dialogue with any country about giving up our rights."
He added, however, that Iran was prepared to talk to the international
community about large-scale enrichment.
Mottaki did not specify with whom Iran wants to hold negotiations. The
United States is facing calls from its European allies for it to enter
direct talks with Iran to resolve the standoff.
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier underlined his
country's support for U.S.-Iran nuclear talks ahead of a meeting in
Washington with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
"I think it is recognized here in Washington that the British and the
German foreign ministers are positive on this question," he told
reporters Tuesday.
State Department spokesman Adam Ereli said Monday the cause of the
standoff was "not because the United States isn't in negotiations"
but because Iran was defying international pressure and "moving with
apparently great determination to develop an enrichment capability."
"So don't suggest that the way to solve this is for the U.S. to jump
into negotiations. The way to resolve it is to get Iran to cease and
desist from its active refusal to be a responsible member of the
international community," Ereli said.
Iran and the United States have agreed to hold rare direct, high-level
talks to discuss how to stabilize Iraq. While both sides have insisted
the talks won't touch on the nuclear issue, U.S. officials say they
suspect Tehran is looking to open the door for nuclear talks.
Since the U.N. Security Council issued its demand last week, Iran has
taken a stance of rejection -- while playing up hopes for a negotiated
solution.
Mottaki said Iran's nuclear program had two options: cooperation or
confrontation. "Iran prefers the first option," he said.
On Monday, hard-line Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the
United States and Europe were "confused" if they thought they could
stop Iran's nuclear ambitions. But he vowed Iran's nuclear program
would be "transparent" and under the supervision of the International
Atomic Energy Agency.
Past negotiations have faltered over the enrichment issue. Britain,
France and Germany negotiated with Iran for two years on behalf of the
European Union, endeavoring to persuade Tehran to abandon enrichment.
Iran gave up on the negotiations last August and resumed parts of its
nuclear program that it had suspended as a goodwill gesture.
Moscow then tried to persuade Tehran to accept a U.S.-backed
compromise proposal under which large-scale uranium enrichment for
Iran's nuclear program would take place in Russia. But negotiations
ended in a stalemate after Tehran rejected a Russian demand to suspend
uranium enrichment activities at home.
The following item considers uranium from a radiological perspective but
the danger to DNA presented by DU as a chemical agent has since been
shown to be just as real.
http://vocuspr.vocus.com/VocusPR30/DotNet/Newsroom/Query.aspx?SiteName=
nau&Entity=PRAsset&SF_PRAsset_PRAssetID_EQ=107192&XSL=PressRelease
The uranyl ion which can and does enter cells has an astronomical
affinity for DNA;
<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Regarding the radiological issue, the European Committee on Radiation
Risk (ECRR) an independent radiation risk agency based in Brussels has
published a risk model which draws attention to the inadequacy of the
ICRP radiation risk models for dealing with the health consequences on
internal radionuclides (ECRR2003). The concerns of ECRR have recently
been echoed by the French IRSN agency who have agreed that the ECRR
questions over the adequacy of the ICRP model for internal exposures to
e.g. uranium are valid. (IRSN2005). The errors in the ICRP model, which
is based on external irradiation following an acute large dose, are
particularly important when considering internal radioactive particles
and DNA seeking isotopes. The uranium weapons aerosols are in both these
categories since the particles have mean diameters below 1 micrometer and
are respirable and when translocated to the tissue from the lungs via the
lymphatic circulation can cause high uranium ion concentrations in cells.
Uranium as uranyl ion UO2++ has enormous affinity for DNA phosphate. The
affinity constant is about 1010, (Nielsen 1992) and uranium stains have
been used for DNA imaging in electron microscopy since the 1960s (Zobel
et al 1961, Huxley and Zubay 1961). Recently, one of us has pointed out
that the uranium may focus external natural background radiation on the
DNA and enhance its radiological effect. (Busby 2005, Busby 2005b).
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2006/DU-Europe-Contamination1jan06.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:53 pm
From: "Komin"
the Chinese hopes to delay the Iran War until 2008 , in case the
Taiwanese
president declares Taiwan's Independence in 2008 .
But if president Bush pushes for a Iran War , then the US military
will be busy for the next 3 year s.
President Bush wants to use the American Robust Nuclear Earth Buster
bombs .
Iran ' s bunker is 70 feet deep in the Rock .
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Iran Plans On Ivading And Occupying The USA And Will Enslave Us All! We
Must Attack Them Before They Invade US!!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/6113f636165294a4
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:21 pm
From: "Komin"
President Bush wants to use US nuclear bombs to destroy Iranian' s
nuclear facilities .
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 2:11 am
From: Bob Immenhaus
They're going to conquer us with Weapons of Mass Instruction.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: AID TO ISRAEL MAY BE CANCELLED!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/9126bc5d0bc244ca
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:31 pm
From: "NefeshBarYochai"
>serwad wrote:
>"I hope the time is not far off,when I shall be able to unite all the wise
>and educated men of all the countries and establish auniform regime based on
>the principles of Qu'ran, which alone are true.and which alone can lead,man
>to happiness" (Napoleon Bonaparte)
If in fact that french panty sniffer really said that then that is the
main reason he lost. The Koran isn't something a person wants to
fight, honor and defend, but rather the Koran is something any sane
person should burn while learning Torah.
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 9:42 pm
From: "serwad"
"NefeshBarYochai" <tachnan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144632672.885758.97030@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >serwad wrote:
>
>>"I hope the time is not far off,when I shall be able to unite all the wise
>>and educated men of all the countries and establish auniform regime based
>>on
>>the principles of Qu'ran, which alone are true.and which alone can
>>lead,man
>>to happiness" (Napoleon Bonaparte)
I do not think that every person can be a good muslim. Most especially Jews,
Since honor and decency are the main requirements of good muslim, jews have
none of those!
==============================================================================
TOPIC: HOMELAND SECURITY AGENT ARRESTED FOR SEDUCING 14-YR-OLD GIRL
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/009334c1cbc0f97e
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:31 pm
From: "0:->"
Greegor wrote:
> Off topic?
>
> A pedophile at #4 position in Homeland Security? Brian Doyle
> With a PRIOR HISTORY of being fired for downloading PORNO at Time
> Magazine?
>
> How is that off topic for ascps?
It has nothing to do with children or families as CPS is involved. The
issue of pedophilia is one for criminal law enforcement, not child
protection agencies that deal with civil laws.
> How is it that Time Magazine didn't speak up BEFORE
> about this perv holding such a position?
And get sued?
If he wasn't criminally charged and convicted, (and sometimes even if
someone IS) if you pass it around in such a way as he cannot find work
or gets fired you will be sued and pay big time.
Being a 'bad' person does not automatically strip someone of all their
rights.
When the hell are YOU going to do some self education and retain it?
You can't seem to remember things I've told you repeatedly and just keep
humming the same droaning tune.
Kane
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin
==============================================================================
TOPIC: JEWISH TERRORISTS....
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/edc3b0051a6c40fc
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 9:36 pm
From: "serwad"
....HAVE MURDERED AT LEAST 16 UNARMED PALESTINIANS IN THE PAST TWO DAYS.
ANY IDEA WHY JEWS LOVE TO MURDER PEOPLE?
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 6:43 pm
From: "NefeshBarYochai"
>serwad
>ANY IDEA WHY JEWS LOVE TO MURDER PEOPLE?
Oh dear shitbird of the Muslim nature, Jews don't murder people but
Jews do kill terrorist that are bent on hurting or murdering Israelis,
Americans or any other decent person that seeks to live in peace.
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 9:51 pm
From: "serwad"
"NefeshBarYochai" <tachnan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144633398.998012.144160@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >serwad
>
>>ANY IDEA WHY JEWS LOVE TO MURDER PEOPLE?
IN THE PASDT TWO DAYS JEWISH TERRORISTS HAVE MURDERED 16-17 PALESTINIANS IN
COLD BLOOD, AND ZIONAZI BASTARDS STILL JUSTIFY THAT BY CALLING PALESTINIANS
"TERRORISTS"
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Apr 10 2006 1:52 am
From: "Doc Martian"
http://www.jewsnotzionists.org
"serwad" <serwad@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:MAi_f.2284$zh1.593@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> ....HAVE MURDERED AT LEAST 16 UNARMED PALESTINIANS IN THE PAST TWO DAYS.
> ANY IDEA WHY JEWS LOVE TO MURDER PEOPLE?
>
>
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Where are all the great ruins of the Negro nations?
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/5cfe37852f40f77c
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 9:54 pm
From: Voice Of Reason <>
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:18:27 -0700, Von Bailey
<ovbailey@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:14:27 -0400, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 05:11:48 -0700, Von Bailey
>><ovbailey@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:50:39 -0400, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 15:10:06 -0800, Von Bailey
>>>><ovbailey@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 17:44:19 -0500, Voice Of Reason <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"James Crow" <dont_let_the_sun_go_down_on_you_bw@h.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:drrmvi$vfj$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aztecs, Mayans, Egyptians, Babylonians, Chinese, Japanese, Europeans, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They all had their great buildings and their great empires with plenty of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruins and evidence to show it. Egyptians are famous for their great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pyramids, Aztecs and Mayans had temples and cities, Romans had colosseums,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chinese had the great wall... all evidence of great empires.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Someone help me find a link to the great Sub-Saharan Negro Pyramids, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Negro Wall, or how about the great paved roads connecting the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greatand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superior Negro Empires. I would like to see great stone Negro castles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evidence of bronze swords and armor, the great Negro Aqueducts that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spanned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for miles, and the Great Negro Architectural bridges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So where are all these sub-Saharan nations that ya read about in books
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that existed before the War? How many? 20? 30? Name them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Three or four come to mind...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ghana, with a history that listed 44 Kings before Christ and as far
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>back as the 7th century BC. It was known as the "Land of Gold"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>because it supplied the mineral on an international basis and had an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iron industry for over a thousand years. Using the Niger and lesser
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rivers in the empire they were able to build a system of cities and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>towns that produced commercial goods for the world.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not as independent nation, but a collection of regional tribes, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>then later a British colony as part of its so-called Gold Coast.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ghana did not become a nation until 1957, 12 years *after* the War.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They imported salt, textiles, cowrie shells, brass, dates, figs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pearls, fruit, sugar, dried rasins and hoone. Some of heir chief
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>exports were gold, ivory, rubber. In 1060, the impreial army numbered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>200,000 of which 100,000 were mounted and 40,000 were expertly trained
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bow and arrow brigades. Their most famous schools were Kumbi-Saleh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and Dejenne (also known as Kumbi-Kumbi and Jenne respectively) and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>world renowned school called The University fo Sankore was at Timbuktu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(just north of Ghana).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mali, under the rule of Muslim kings, the greatest of which was Mansa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Musa, who wanted to be known as the greatest Black Muslim in all of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Africa. Under his rule Mali indulged in international trade. By the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mid 1300's Mali was an empire of it's own right. It controled the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>salt mines of Taghaza, encompassed Nigeria in the east and Fulani in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the west.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope. Mali become a nation in 1960.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Songhay, their most prosperous time during the 15th and 16th
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>centuries. It had a long history of dias (kings) that coul be traced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>back to the 7th century. They had gained control over the main
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>caravan city in western Africa Gao. With this as a foundation they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>built a nation that lasted until the mid 1600s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The Mossi States, an amagamation of kingdoms with common values and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>kinship. The most prominent of which were Wagdug, Yatenga, Fada
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gurma, Mamprussi and Dagomba. They had the most successful calvary in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Africa and stood their own against the empires of Mali and Songhay.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They had a political structure that started with a King of Kings (as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>each individual state had a govenor who had absolute control of his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>particular state) and a prime minister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There are quite a few more. If you're really interested (and that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sarcastic as I know you aren't) you might start with Chancellor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Williams "The destruction of Black Civilization, Great issues of race
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>from 4500 B.C to 2000 A.D." It's where I got some of the information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>above.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>These were not nations, but as you yourself quoted above, but loose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>collections ("amalgamation of kingdoms") of tribes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just look at the current state of the Congo for how they existed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hundreds of years ago -- almost non-stop skirmishs between numerous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>regional groups (tribes) and sometimes all-out warfare.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There was a time when the losers of these battles would be sold off by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the victors into slavery, and yes, pass through what is now known as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ghana on their way to the New World. So much for their "great ruins".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thank you for that 'non-referenced' pack of lies and ignorance about a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>place you have demonstrated supreme stupidity about. It appears that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>your entire knowledge of African history appears to be what you read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the captions of National Geographic while looking for pictures of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>women's breast to jack off to ass a kid.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nice try but wrong all around. IF ya have facts (not wild-eyed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>guesses) that repudiate what I said, then post them right here .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I cited a book that backs up everything I've said and you have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>refernced NOTHING. There is plenty of evidence of nations and even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>empires in sub-sahara africa and your stupidity and ignorance about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>them doesn't change that it the least. Your comments didn't do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything except demonstrate what you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So what, anyone can write a book and say whatever they want. Nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>changes the fact that the colonial era ended after WW II.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The work has already been done and the evidence is in the book. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>inability to read a book is the only thing keeping you from the
>>>>>>>>>>>information.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0840304587/sr=8-1/qid=1143639149/ref=sr_1_1/104-3978265-5687924?%5Fencoding=UTF8
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I'm not going to do your homework for you. IF the evidence exists,
>>>>>>>>>>you need to spit it out in a coherent manner. And no, book reviews on
>>>>>>>>>>Amazon don't count, since anyone can go there and write a book review,
>>>>>>>>>>without even having read the book.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's not a reference to book reviews stupid, it was a source for the
>>>>>>>>>book which would present the evidence in a "coherent manner". Still
>>>>>>>>>running from the evidence. You would rather stay ignorant than
>>>>>>>>>challenge your racist assumptions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And anyone can write a book too. You should put forth some concrete
>>>>>>>>evidence right here and now, or else withdraw your claims.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The book is the evidence stupid and until you read the book you have
>>>>>>>no idea if the evidence in it is correct or not. But again, to many
>>>>>>>words for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nope, one more time: Anyone can write a book. So I don't have time
>>>>>>to read every book that comes down the pike. YOU made the claim, now
>>>>>>show the "evidence" that prompted you to make this claim, or else do
>>>>>>the right thing and withdraw it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thank you for admiting you don't have time to read the evidence and
>>>>>also an apparent display of obtuseness. The EVIDENCE is in the book
>>>>>you won't read and you aren't apparenly bright enough to realize that.
>>>>
>>>>Let's try this again -- anyone can write a book.
>>>
>>>If that's true, or even a relevant argument, where's your book?
>>
>>The first 2/3's of your sentence are true and relevant, but the last
>>1/3, well that's another story.
>>
>Your irrelevant judgment shall be assumed another pitiful attempt to
>avoid reading a book. Scared of what's in it no doubt. Harder to stay
>in denial when you've actually read the evidence.
IOW, you probably read a book review somewhere, or heard someone
hawking the book on a talk show, and you decided well by golly there's
something you can wave around as if you knew something. But if I ask
you to cut to the chase and show me specifics from the book, suddenly
you throw it out the window and ask me to go find it, and do your
research for you.
>>>>So the mere fact
>>>>that someone wrote one is not enough to prove anything, you cannot
>>>>simply throw titles around and say go read it.
>>>
>>>It's more relevant than your references to unnamed policemen,
>>>libraries (but not specific books), and assumptions of things that
>>>'everyone knows'
>>
>>Because everyone knows that I don't make stuff up out of thin air.
>
>That's a lie. Everyone knows no such thing and it isn't true just
>because you say so.
No, it's true because it is.
>>Like reading *one* book that may or not have been peer reviewed, much
>>less vetted and found to be reliable, then basing my claims around
>>that.
>>
>And as usual, instead of refuting the veracity of the evidence (which
>you would have to read and comprehend, something beyond your abilities
>apparently) you make unfounded comments about it.
Well I'm waiting for you to show some specifics from it.
>>>>YOU made the claim
>>>>about said evidence, so spit it out. Show me specific passages from
>>>>the book that you think support your claim. If possible.
>>>
>>>Like I said, you can't read a book. It would be sad if you weren't so
>>>pitiful.
>>
>>No, I can't (and won't) read YOUR books for you. *You* cited it, now
>>show that you read it.
>
>It's not my book stupid and I've already cited it.
Yes, I *know* you've cited it, just like I said. Sheesh, your reading
comprehension needs a tune-up. What I'm waiting for you to show
*specific passages* that make your case. Guess I'm going to be
waiting a long time....
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Thank you, India admirer !
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/e5d8f7ba709dcb5b
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:00 pm
From: gunjan.ghai@gmail.com
Seeker
Now that you are healthy, can you answer the question on shias,
ahmedis, sindhis, baluchs, mohajirs etc etc ?
You cant get away by trying to provoke the other person with abuses
like you did....you are ducking the question, my friend.
Seeker wrote:
> <gunjan.ghai@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1144604510.832192.200660@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Seeker
> >
> > We heard you had kidney trouble....all ok with you ?
>
> You heard wrong, bubba, I have never had any kidney problem, but thanks for
> asking.
>
> I don't know why you guys confuse me for someone else.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: NO LINK TO AL QAEDA, JUST LIKE IN 911
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/69c428c609c64c3a
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 10:03 pm
From: "serwad"
A government inquiry into the terrorist attack in London last July 7 will
say there was no direct support from al-Qaeda, even though two of the
bombers had visited Pakistan.
The first forensic account of the public transport bombings, ordered by
Britain's Home Office, will say the attack was the product of a "simple and
inexpensive" plot hatched by four British suicide bombers bent on martyrdom,
The Observer reported yesterday.
The attack was the work of four "seemingly normal" men who had scoured
terrorist sites on the internet, not an international terrorist network, the
inquiry will reportedly say when it is published in the next few weeks.
It will also discount initial suspicions that a fifth bomber may have
escaped after the attack, or that an al-Qaeda fixer helped plan the attacks,
the paper said.
"Confirmation of the nature of the attacks will raise fresh concerns over
the vulnerability of Britain to an attack by small, unsophisticated groups,'
The Observer said. A fortnight after the July 7 attack an unconnected group
of four tried to duplicate it, but their devices failed to detonate.
The newspaper suggested that the findings will draw criticism for failing to
address concerns as to why no action was taken against the bombers even
though the group's leader, Mohammed Sidique Khan, was identified by
intelligence officers months before the attack.
A senior British academic, Ron Geaves, asserted in another newspaper report
published yesterday that the bombings were not acts of terrorism but "a
demonstration", part of a long history of protests by British Muslims.
Professor Geaves also told The Sunday Telegraph that to refer to the attacks
as terrorism risked "demonising" those involved.
Professor Geaves had researched the history of demonstrations by British
Muslims, from the demonstrations against the author Salman Rushdie to the
anti-war protests after the invasion of Iraq.
"I have included, rather controversially, the events in London as primarily
an extreme form of demonstration and assess what these events actually mean
in terms of their significance in the Muslim community," he said.
The July 7 bombings of Underground trains and a bus killed 56 people,
including the four bombers, and wounded hundreds. It was the worst terrorist
attack on British soil and the first by suicide bombers. Three of the four
bombers were of Pakistani descent, and two had visited Pakistan before the
attack.
Associated Press, Telegraph, London
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:04 pm
From: "NefeshBarYochai"
,
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Indians Become Christian - Chinese Become Muslim
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/94a7c72770b10f0c
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:10 pm
From: "Arindam Banerjee"
Haines Brown wrote:
> "TheSecularist" <abc123@geocities.com> writes:
>
> > "Komin" <veakrin@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1144117818.003936.53910@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >> Christianity is a White Racist Religion .
> >>
> >> so Asians, beware of the Christians.
> >>
> >> the Christians will kill you for their White Racist Pope, the
> >> Christians have killed many races all over the World in the last
> >> 1000 years for and on behalf of their White Racist Pope in Rome.
> >
> > Christianity is an alien religion in Europe. Christianity does not
> > originate with Europeans. Jesus probably looked like a modern
> > Palestinian. The true religions of Europe are Germanic and Celtic
> > paganism etc.
>
> I don't believe this is a fair representation of the situation.
>
> To suggest that a particular religion is true to a region because it
> happened to originate there does not make much sense.
But it does. Paganism always relates to those regions where there is a
lot of life, plenty of wild animals, where nature is friendly, etc.
Monotheisms arise from the desert; where there is lack of life, no wild
animals or plants, a lot of rivalry and competition as nature is too
harsh.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: The sociology of sexual misconducts between teachers and students in
America.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/d1d8cb27ee7adc77
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:14 pm
From: "The Positive Believer"
Sunday April 9, 2006
Good day:
Some would tend to blame America's Technological Revolutions and the
advance use of the many communication products and accessories for the
increased sexual misconduct between teachers and students. That may
only be partly correctly. Last week Rachel Holt "secret affair" with a
student certainly re-opened our eyes to the vast increased amount of
these cases in America's schools. Justin Berry revelations to our
Constitutional Officials last week also shook us - even if for the
moment. But this issue really negatively affects teens, younger ones
and their families.
Since 1996 it is said that "child pronography" increased over 2000%.
That is a very high rate of increase. Children affected face serious
mental health problems later in life, suffer from broken
social-psychological spirit and display anti-social attitudes, to name
a few negatives from this conduct. Cell phones, emails, instant
messages and other tech devices are certainly good for all of us to
use, so we cannot blame them. Teachers, school masters, assistants and
administrators have all been involved in this kind of cruelity to
children. People are to blame not technological equipments. The
affected persons and families must report such behavior to the legal
officials. Parents must not shy from cases concerning their children.
School Boards, Principals and Administrators must be vigilant to at
least reducing this evil to children.
I am very surprised to hear from the legal and administrative officials
that the reported cases are just a small percentage of the real number
of cases. Well, for all of us future, I hope the trend of reported
cases will increase and real cases decrease especially in the interest
of the American children welfare and future!
Sincerely,
The Positive Believer
Receive NiceOffers Savings at: https://www.niceoffers.com/9179893
==============================================================================
TOPIC: is president Bush preparing to use Nuclear bombs to destroy Iran ?
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/4394913e837521f4
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:29 pm
From: "Komin"
in an Interview last night on the CNN ,
Mr. Seymour Hersh explained to Mr. Wolf Blitzer that president Bush
might be preparing to use the US new Mini nuclear bomb , called the
Robust Nuclear Earth Buster bombs,
to destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities inside Iran .
should president Bush use this new Mini Nuclear bombs on Iran ?
the Chinese military hopes to delay the Iran War until 2008 when the
Taiwanese president hopes to declare Taiwan 's Independence just
before Beijing 's Olympic..
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:37 pm
From: denny_cheng@163.com
Komin 写道：
> in an Interview last night on the CNN ,
> Mr. Seymour Hersh explained to Mr. Wolf Blitzer that president Bush
> might be preparing to use the US new Mini nuclear bomb , called the
> Robust Nuclear Earth Buster bombs,
> to destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities inside Iran .
>
> should president Bush use this new Mini Nuclear bombs on Iran ?
>
> the Chinese military hopes to delay the Iran War until 2008 when the
> Taiwanese president hopes to declare Taiwan 's Independence just
> before Beijing 's Olympic..
It depends on the USA's economic situation. If nobody helps USA to
resolve the double deficits problem, the US can foresee that its
economy cannot keep on going well; then, the only method for US is to
delcare war to Iran and pulls all other countries into the recession
together with US.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: WORLD WAR III NEWS, Monday, April 10th, 2006 AD......Iran attack would
be 'nuts'
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/5f8a6fe8a4a0fc80
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:29 pm
From: "The Last 2446 Days™ ♥"
Gooday peoplez,
Looks like the fan has already short-circuited due to all the icky
brown stuff clogging up & splattering those walls in a lovely shade of
"Mud brick brown" & that Fat Lady iz definately busting her britches &
bursting at the seams, her bladder's about to explode *BIG TIME* and
not only flood the orchestra pit -- but the entire Opera House as well
!!!
She's well & truly ready to strut her stuff......
I had a nasty dream last night -- I dreamt I was walking down the
street & a "Ali G" clone or look-a-like approached me from nowhere &
asked me the following:
"Uncle Wally, iz dis world,.....(pause)..... az we currently knowz
it,.............(even longer pause).......... basically fricked beyond
all repair ?!?!?"
To which I answered candidly:
"Well, my deviant hideous little hooked-nosed parasitic friend, on a
Frickability scale of 1 to 10, we've passed Fricksville & Superfricked
& well & truly on the way to number 10 --
FRICK CITY" !!!!
To which he answered "Why, Thank-U, Uncle Wally, I feel much better
now, knowing that !!!", "You've saved the day once again, Uncle Wally
!!!"
HOOROOH
UNCLE WALLY
---0---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=C3HY5I431EHHRQFIQMGSFFWAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2006/04/09/wbush09.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/04/09/ixportaltop.html
Bush 'is planning nuclear strikes on Iran's secret sites'
By Philip Sherwell in Washington
(Filed: 09/04/2006)
Jack Straw: Iran attack would be 'nuts'
The Bush administration is planning to use nuclear weapons against
Iran, to prevent it acquiring its own atomic warheads, claims an
investigative writer with high-level Pentagon and intelligence
contacts.
President George W Bush is said to be so alarmed by the threat of
Iran's hard-line leader, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, that privately he refers
to him as "the new Hitler", says Seymour Hersh, who broke the story of
the Abu Ghraib Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal.
Mahmoud Ahmedinejad: 'The new Hitler'
Some US military chiefs have unsuccessfully urged the White House to
drop the nuclear option from its war plans, Hersh writes in The New
Yorker magazine. The conviction that Mr Ahmedinejad would attack Israel
or US forces in the Middle East, if Iran obtains atomic weapons, is
what drives American planning for the destruction of Teheran's nuclear
programme.
Hersh claims that one of the plans, presented to the White House by the
Pentagon, entails the use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon,
such as the B61-11, against underground nuclear sites. One alleged
target is Iran's main centrifuge plant, at Natanz, 200 miles south of
Teheran.
Although Iran claims that its nuclear programme is peaceful, US and
European intelligence agencies are certain that Teheran is trying to
develop atomic weapons. In contrast to the run-up to the Iraq invasion,
there are no disagreements within Western intelligence about Iran's
plans.
This newspaper disclosed recently that senior Pentagon strategists are
updating plans to strike Iran's nuclear sites with long-distance B2
bombers and submarine-launched missiles. And last week, the Sunday
Telegraph reported a secret meeting at the Ministry of Defence where
military chiefs and officials from Downing Street and the Foreign
Office discussed the consequences of an American-led attack on Iran,
and Britain's role in any such action.
The military option is opposed by London and other European capitals.
But there are growing fears in No 10 and the Foreign Office that the
British-led push for a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear
stand-off, will be swept aside by hawks in Washington. Hersh says that
within the Bush administration, there are concerns that even a
pummelling by conventional strikes, may not sufficiently damage Iran's
buried nuclear plants.
Iran has been developing a series of bunkers and facilities to provide
hidden command centres for its leaders and to protect its nuclear
infrastructure. The lack of reliable intelligence about these
subterranean facilities, is fuelling pressure for tactical nuclear
weapons to be included in the strike plans as the only guaranteed means
to destroy all the sites simultaneously.
The attention given to the nuclear option has created serious
misgivings among the joint chiefs of staff, and some officers have
talked about resigning, Hersh has been told. The military chiefs sought
to remove the nuclear option from the evolving war plans for Iran,
without success, a former senior intelligence officer said.
The Pentagon consultant on the war on terror confirmed that some in the
administration were looking seriously at this option, which he linked
to a resurgence of interest in tactical nuclear weapons among defence
department political appointees.
The election of Mr Ahmedinejad last year, has hardened attitudes within
the Bush Administration. The Iranian president has said that Israel
should be "wiped off the map". He has drafted in former fellow
Revolutionary Guards commanders to run the nuclear programme, in
further signs that he is preparing to back his threats with action.
Mr Bush and others in the White House view him as a potential Adolf
Hitler, a former senior intelligence official told Hersh. "That's the
name they're using. They say, 'Will Iran get a strategic weapon and
threaten another world war?' "
Despite America's public commitment to diplomacy, there is a growing
belief in Washington that the only solution to the crisis is regime
change. A senior Pentagon consultant said that Mr Bush believes that he
must do "what no Democrat or Republican, if elected in the future,
would have the courage to do," and "that saving Iran is going to be his
legacy".
Publicly, the US insists it remains committed to diplomacy to solve the
crisis. But with Russia apparently intent on vetoing any threat of
punitive action at the UN, the Bush administration is also planning for
unilateral military action. Hersh repeated his claims that the US has
intensified clandestine activities inside Iran, using special forces to
identify targets and establish contact with anti-Teheran
ethnic-minority groups.
The senior defence officials said that Mr Bush is "determined to deny
Iran the opportunity to begin a pilot programme, planned for this
spring, to enrich uranium".
---0---
==============================================================================
TOPIC: GENIE HAS THE ANSWER
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/browse_thread/thread/c53109850ba806e2
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Apr 9 2006 7:37 pm
From: "serwad"
A woman rubbed a bottle and out popped a genie. The amazed woman
asked if she got three wishes.
The genie said, "Nope, sorry, three-wish genies are a storybook myth.
I'm a one-wish genie. So... what'll it be?"
The woman did not hesitate. She said, "I want peace in the Middle
East. See this map? I want these countries to stop fighting with each other
and want all the Arabs to love the Jews and Americans and vice-versa. It
will bring about world peace and harmony."
The genie looked at the map and exclaimed, "Lady, be reasonable.
These countries have been at war for thousands of years. I'm out of shape
after being in a bottle for five hundred years. I'm good but not THAT good!
I don't think it can be done. Make another wish and please be reasonable."
The woman thought for a minute and said, "Well, I've never been able
to find the right man. You know - one that's considerate and fun, likes to
cook and help with the house cleaning, is great in bed, and gets along with
my family, doesn't watch sports all the time, and is
faithful. That is what I wish for...a good man."
The genie let out a sigh and said, "Let me see the damn map again."
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "soc.culture.usa"
group.
To post to this group, send email to soc.culture.usa@googlegroups.com or visit
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to soc.culture.usa-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/subscribe
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com
